Islamabad (HRNW) – The Supreme Court of Pakistan has adjourned the hearing of a case related to human rights activist and lawyer Iman Mazari. During the proceedings, lawyers presented arguments regarding legal points, judicial proceedings, and the importance of ensuring access to justice.
The Additional Attorney General informed the court that the relevant case is already scheduled for hearing before the Islamabad High Court on 24 July, which was one of the reasons the matter came before the Supreme Court.
Iman Mazari’s counsel informed the court that the case was fixed due to proceedings before the Supreme Court. Advocate Faisal Siddiqui argued that justice is expected from the Supreme Court and stated that the previous hearing had been adjourned due to the prosecution’s position.
During the hearing, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar observed that the Supreme Court cannot regulate the proceedings of the High Court while sitting in the Supreme Court. In response, Advocate Faisal Siddiqui stated that in several cases, the Supreme Court has issued directions to High Courts.
Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar clarified that there is a difference between regulating proceedings and issuing judicial directions. Advocate Faisal Siddiqui requested the court to hear his arguments on the legal points regarding the maintainability of the case, adding that if this was not possible, the matter could be adjourned for two weeks.
Human rights observers emphasize that cases involving activists and legal professionals highlight the importance of fair trial rights, due process, freedom of expression, and access to justice. International human rights standards recognize the right of every individual to a fair hearing and effective legal protection.
HRNW is reporting this matter from a human rights and public awareness perspective, focusing on the principles of justice, rule of law, and fundamental freedoms.
🤝 Support the World’s No. 1 Human Rights News Agency – HRNW
👉 https://www.hrnww.com/?page_id=1083
⚠️ Important Note
This news is not affiliated with any party, organization, or individual involved in the case, nor does it represent HRNW’s position on the matter. HRNW publishes such information solely for public awareness, human rights education, and the dissemination of information. The statements mentioned belong to the respective parties, while the final decision rests with the court.
