Karachi (HRNW): The Sindh High Court has dismissed an appeal filed by a husband against a Family Court decision regarding the recovery of dowry articles and bridal jewelry. Upholding the lower court’s decree, the High Court directed the immediate return of the dowry items to the aggrieved woman. Mr. Justice Hassan Akbar issued the formal written order on the petition.
Background of the Marital Dispute
According to the written order, the couple tied the knot in 2002. At the time of the wedding, the dowry articles, jewelry, and other bridal gifts presented by the woman’s parents remained in the physical custody of the husband and his immediate family members. The woman maintained that her gold jewelry was securely stored inside a bank locker registered under the joint names of her husband and her mother-in-law. Due to severe domestic discord, the woman eventually left the matrimonial home in 2006 along with her two sons, and the husband formally divorced her in 2007.
Contradictory Pleadings by the Husband
The High Court order highlighted massive discrepancies in the husband’s legal defense. While the husband initially claimed that the list of dowry articles presented by his ex-wife was entirely fabricated and concocted, he simultaneously conceded to a major portion of the very same list in his written statement, expressing a willingness to return only the non-gold items.
The court remarked that a party cannot legally be permitted to selectively accept certain portions of a list while dismissing the rest as fraudulent to suit their convenience.
Bank Locker Evidences and Judicial Interventions
Regarding the disputed gold jewelry, the court scrutinized the bank records which confirmed that the security locker was registered exclusively under the names of the husband and his mother. The registry logs also established that the woman had not operated or accessed the locker during the final two months leading up to her departure from the house.
Mr. Justice Hassan Akbar noted that if the woman had actually extracted and taken the jewelry with her, the locker holders would have naturally filed an immediate complaint with the bank management or law enforcement authorities, which they failed to do.
Limitations of the Appellate Forum
The High Court concluded that the Family Court had rendered its judgment after a meticulous evaluation of all available circumstantial evidence, bank locker records, and the contradictory stances of the litigating parties.
The order clarified that the High Court, while functioning as an appellate forum, does not sit to reappraise or re-evaluate the factual findings of a lower court from scratch. Appellate intervention is strictly reserved for instances where a patent illegality, procedural defect, or a gross jurisdictional error is proven in the trial court’s judgment. Finding no such errors, the court upheld the original decree.
Support Our Mission:
Join HRNW, the world’s No. 1 Human Rights News Portal, in our mission to be a timely voice for human rights and public issues. Your support enables us to continue promoting the truth and speaking up for the oppressed.
Click here to help us: HRNW Support Link
